|
the richard kelly articles
In a fortnightly contribution, Richard
Kelly's look at what is currently happening
at White Hart Lane provides a thought provoking view on the club
10.03.2008 Brave New World
24.03.2008 Enigma
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
05.05.2008
END OF AN
ERA
On Sunday, Tottenham Hotspur, as we have
known it for the past four seasons will be at an end. The team,
forged in Jol’s image, will never take the field in the competitive
match again. Have we already seen the last appearance of Berbatov,
Robinson, King, Lennon, Chimbonda and Lee in Tottenham colours?
Will Dawson and Jenas play their last games against Liverpool?
Possibly, some cases, certainly in others. Only a handful of men
know the answer to those questions, and for the time being, they
aren’t saying.
Nevertheless, the
side which Jol built (and with the exception of Hutton and Woodgate
the other nine players all were either signed by Jol, or in the
cases of Keane, Robinson and King, played their best football under
him) did win a trophy, albeit with Ramos in charge; the man who has
been given the unenviable task of taking Tottenham to the ‘next
level,’ namely, breaking the cartel of the Big Four.
So, how does this
Tottenham side, as trophy winners, rank against previous silverware
winning sides? After all, a team which wins a pot can’t be a bad
one, can they? Here’s how I see they rank against other previous
trophy winning Spurs sides (for the record, I wont include pre-War
sides, because I don’t know enough about them).
-
1959 – 1964
(Honours: 1 First Division Championship, 2 FA Cups, 1 Cup
Winner’s Cup) The Classic Line Up: Brown, Baker, Henry, Norman,
Blanchflower, Mackay, White, Jones, Smith, Greaves/Allen,
Dyson. Manager: Nicholson.
I don’t think
there would be any Spurs fan in the land who would put another side
above this one. I have chosen those dates for this era because 1959
was the year Mackay arrived, and drove Tottenham to unprecedented
success, and 1964 was the year White died, and the team was
dismantled. No-one can doubt the impact that side had on the
English game, re-writing records that had seemed to stand in stone.
Until that point,
no side had won the double since the 19th Century, these
being the days were only one or two clubs played in Europe each
season, a time when the Cup was still seen as more significant than
the league, the fledgling season of the League Cup (and voluntary
entry) and at least a dozen clubs fancied their chances of the
title.
In 1960/61,
Tottenham not only won the double, and the league with games to
spare, they played the game with a flourish, unmatched in style
until Arsenal’s unbeaten season, when they were finally matched.
Yet the legacy they left, long faded in many memories, is the
yardstick to which all subsequent Tottenham sides have been
measured, after all isn’t every new striker compared to Greaves, and
every midfielder to Mackay and Blanchflower?
Tottenham won the
first eleven matches of the start of that season, and to date,
no-one has ever equalled that. The following season saw Tottenham
retain the FA Cup, the first time that feat had been achieved for a
decade, and only the second time since 1891, reach the European Cup
Semi-Finals (where the team were knocked out in distinctly dubious
circumstances), and finish third in the table. They were the first
side to chase the treble, and were very unlucky not to have achieved
it.
They were the
first side to win a European trophy, destroying Atletico Madrid 5-1
in the final, the Spanish side a highly rated one, having finished
runner’s up in La Liga that season, and holders of the Cup Winner’s
Cup.
If you need
further proof that this Tottenham side was the greatest ever to
grace the white shirt, then consider the fact that within this era,
there is the only Spurs side to win two trophies (proper trophies,
not Charity Shields) in one campaign.
-
1949 – 1952
(Honours: 1 First Division Championship, 1 Second Division
Championship) The Classic Line Up: Ditchburn, Ramsey, Nicholson,
Burgess, McClellan, Walters, Bennett, Baily, Medley, Duquemin,
Murphy. Manager: Rowe.
More than simply
winning trophies and breaking records, as the Double winners did so
breaktakingly, the push and run side created the blueprint of
football in which all Tottenham teams must follow. They played the
game in the right way from the off, passing as opposed to dribbling,
with the ball on the floor rather than pumped into the clouds, they
even beat Newcastle, the Cup winners that season, 7-0. It was
innovative football, the precursor to Total Football, and the
brother of the style which was developed by the Hungarians, also
advocated by Rowe when he coached there.
True, there have
been other Tottenham teams which have won more honours, yet in the
early 1950s, only two were available, being the League and Cup, as
European football was still a few years away. That innovation, that
style and swagger are what made this team memorable, and ultimately
what has caused all Spurs managers to insist on good football as the
platform for their success, so from that perspective alone, we
should be truly grateful to them.
-
1980 – 1984
(Honours: 2 FA Cups, 1 UEFA Cup) The Classic Line Up: Clemence,
Hughton, Perryman, Roberts, Archibald, Crooks, Hoddle, Ardiles,
Galvin, Stevens, Miller. Manager: Burkinshaw.
In the early 80s,
Burkinshaw transformed Tottenham from a midtable outfit that played
tidy football, the challengers for the title, and cup winners. The
club played in four cup finals in all, losing one, the League Cup to
Liverpool in 1982 when the match went into extra time and the team
tired as the long season took it’s toll.
In the 1981 final,
Tottenham were not even favourites against a rejuvenated Manchester
City, yet in a thrilling match, the game was settled by Ricky Villa
and Ossie Ardiles, the latter orchestrating the midfield in the
match, and the former scoring twice, including that weaving,
wonderful goal.
That success was
the platform of what was to come, as the team played for five
successive season in Europe, enjoying many great European nights.
The 1981/82 season saw Tottenham reach two cup finals, winning one,
and finishing fourth, and the first time the team had challenged for
the title since 1970/71. The next season they finished fourth
again, just two points from second.
Ultimately, the
era was ended at the board drove Burkinshaw out, his final game the
UEFA Cup Final at White Hart Lane, where the club famously won its
last European trophy on penalties.
-
1970 – 1973
(Honours: 1 UEFA Cup, 2 League Cups) The Classic Line Up:
Jennings, Kinnear, Knowles, Mullery, England, Beal, Gilzean,
Perryman, Chivers, Peters, Coates. Manager: Nicholson.
This was
Nicholson’s second great side, but unlike the previous, this team
could not reach the heights which the double winners scaled, falling
short in the league in 1970/71 and never getting beyond the Sixth
Round in the FA Cup. That said, 2 League Cups, sandwiching a semi
final defeat to Chelsea and 2 appearances in the UEFA Cup final,
sandwiching a semi final defeat to Liverpool show just how close the
team were to an avalanche of silverware.
And in Knowles and
England, Tottenham had two of the great defenders of the early 70s,
playing in front of the top keeper of the day in Jennings, World Cup
winner Peters and the dynamic forward line of Gilzean and Chivers.
Tottenham had a truly great side back in those days, and were very
unlucky not to have won more than they did.
-
1966/1967
(Honours: 1 FA Cup) The Classic Line Up: Jennings, Kinnear,
Knowles, Mullery, England, Mackay, Robertson, Greaves, Gilzean,
Venables, Saul. Manager: Nicholson.
The 1967 Cup
winners are unique in Tottenham history because they are the only
side to be a hybrid; part Double winners, part early 70s sides. In
those days, when managers were given time to build their sides as
opposed to nowadays, when managers must achieve immediate success,
and at the very top clubs, where unless you win the biggest prizes,
namely the Champions League or League Championship, you are seen to
have had a poor season. Even a domestic cup win is now viewed as a
bridesmaid victory, hardly worthy of thought.
Every other
Tottenham team has been one that is the pinnacle of a period,
created in a manager’s image, but this one was an interim side,
built as one faded and another was being built. Aside from setting
a precedent of beating Chelsea in cup finals, the side also went
close in the league, finishing third.
-
1989 - 1991
(Honours: 1 FA Cup) The Classic Line Up: Thorstvedt, Edinburgh,
Van Den Hauwe, Sedgley, Howells, Mabbutt, Stewart, Gascoigne,
Samways, Lineker, Allen. Manager: Venables.
In the 1989/90
season, Tottenham made their last challenge for the title, finishing
the season in third place, yet largely, that achievement has been
eclipsed by the Cup win in 1991. That win is the first trophy I can
remember Tottenham winning, following as it did the 1990 World Cup,
which is the first football tournament I remember (even if my most
vivid recollection is of Miller dancing with the corner flag, or as
one boy told us at school, that was how you had sex. To be fair, we
were six).
To my mind back
then, Gazza was what football was about. He had power, drive, skill
and was slightly crazy, and to a young boy, he all of that summed up
a hero. Regardless of what happened in the final, where he
virtually ruined his career, from the 1990 World Cup until the FA
Cup Final in 1991, Gazza was one of, if not the, best player in the
world.
Of course, most
Tottenham fans, will recall the Semi Final win over Arsenal, and
certainly, it was the defining moment of the era. I think it is
important to just underline how good Arsenal were at that time, just
to prove what a significant victory ours was, in the biggest game
between the two clubs for a few years. In 1987 Arsenal won the
League Cup, upsetting Tottenham in the semi final, they won two
titles, one in 1989 and the second in 1991 as well. Graham’s side
were certainly dour, but there was no question they were effective.
So to beat that
side, which was undoubtedly one of the top teams of the day, in such
a manner, for the first time in many years in which the teams could
be considered to be at an equal level, is a magnificent achievement.
-
2005 - 2008
(Honours: 1 League Cup) The Classic Line Up: Robinson,
Chimbonda, Hutton, Woodgate, King, Jenas, Lennon, Zokora,
Malbranque, Keane, Berbatov. Managers: Jol & Ramos.
For the record, I
would have put the 1987 side above this one, and they would be above
the 1991 Cup winners too, if they had won any trophy, because the
football they played was magnificent. Yet they, like the 1982
Brazilian team, are doomed to spend history in the annals of
failure, because they didn’t win anything, which means they can’t
feature in this list.
That said, the
current squad is not a bad one, despite the abject league
performance they have lumbered through this campaign, and the fact
that we might finish below West Ham just compounds matters.
Ultimately one league hopes were put paid by a bad start, partly due
to bad luck, largely due to the side being unfit, the undermining of
Jol, which wasted a third of the season, and after a brief
rejuvenation, a lack of interest after the League Cup win, when UEFA
Cup football was assured and the squad doubtless assumed everyone
would be satisfied with the salvage job.
More fool them,
because their disinterest looks to be the catalyst for their
break-up, and if I was someone like Dawson, who has lost his way
this season, I would be concerned about my future. And the interest
of Kevin Keegan, a man with a history of walking away from jobs when
they get really difficult and blowing it when pressure is put on
him, wouldn’t comfort me.
Nevertheless,
let’s take a step back for a moment, and look at things a little
more broadly, because this campaign is the culmination of three
previous campaigns. Jol succeeded Santini, the Frenchman unable to
work in the continental system which ultimately cost Jol his
position, as the Dutchman went about the job which Levy had
initially tasked to the triumvirate in tandem with Arnesen.
Youthful, English
players topped the list of targets, and the team was originally
shaped around the spine of Robinson, King and Carrick. The
following season, Jenas arrived to add his work-rate next to
Carrick’s vision, and a whole season playing the Jol way, in which
Robbie Keane was to cement his spot in the side so decisively, saw
Tottenham finish in the top five for the first time since 1990.
They could have done even better were it not for food poisoning on
the final day.
Nevertheless,
hopes were high, and Tottenham followed up their first top five
finish in the Premiership with their second, finishing fifth again.
This time though, the team surged up the table, having been eleventh
when they travelled to fifth place Everton in February. A strong
finish and excellent campaign in the spring, in which they went out
of the League Cup in the semi final, and FA and UEFA Cups in the
quarters, losing to the latter two to the two winners, and unlucky
not to win any of those ties, having taken the lead in all three
ties, and only losing to Seville virtue of an injury crisis which
saw Tainio drafted into the backline, hopes were high going into
2007/08.
Obviously, being
eight points from fourth, but having the third best form in the
league in the final three months, as well as coping playing until
the latter stages of every competition, you could be forgiven for
the high hopes that were carried within the club and fans. The
media too (although you wont hear them say so now, they all backed
us to break the evil cartel in the summer) felt Tottenham would grab
a Champions League spot.
But they bottled
it, and Jol was sacked as a result of poor form, largely due to what
happened in the background, and Ramos came in. The Spaniard, with a
reputation as a winner, basing his footballing philosophy on
retaining possession, fitness, attacking football and good tactics,
was charged with salvaging the season. And, largely using Jol’s
squad, he did, taking Tottenham to the new Wembley, the third top
division side to go there since it was rebuilt, and win the cup,
memorably against Chelsea. Jol’s team in the main, but Ramos’
tactics which got the team there, the Spaniard’s player who scored
the winner, and his substitutions which turned the match.
-
1998/1999
(Honours: 1 League Cup) The Classic Line Up: Walker, Carr,
Edinburgh, Campbell, Vega, Anderton, Freund, Nielsen, Ginola,
Ferdinand, Iversen. Manager: Graham.
I’ll be honest, I
don’t rate the 1999 side that highly. In fact, there have been
plenty of seasons in which Tottenham have achieved far less but
which the team has been far greater, the 2002 League Cup finalists
for starters. The final was hardly a classic, the goal scored in
the dying moments, and the football they played, Ginola apart, was
hardly in Tottenham tradition, yet cup winners they remain, and you
cant knock them because of it. Besides, they reached the FA Cup
semi final too, and were unlucky not to get through. And they were
the only English team apart from Manchester United to win a trophy,
so they can’t have been that bad.
That season, Johan
Cruyff proclaimed Ginola the best player in the world, similarly, so
did the players and football writers award him as the best player in
the Premier League that season, despite Manchester United’s treble
triumph. Yet there were plenty of weaknesses within that side too,
Walker and Vega had their critics, as did Anderton and Nielsen.
Iversen never fulfilled his potential, and Ferdinand couldn’t
recreate his Newcastle form.
The sale of
Ginola, at the end of the following season, pulled out the one cog
on which it looked like the team could be built, as Graham went
about building another dour side, in the image of his previous
Arsenal and Leeds sides. So yet again, what should have been a
springboard to success was eroded because the team was dismantled,
rather than built upon. In this case, the manager, winning a trophy
with a collection of players he inherited, wanted a team more
befitted of his style, hopefully history wont repeat itself this
time, and the side which Ramos builds wont fail to build upon what
we have just achieved.
Has Richard got it right
about the teams that made the club famous ?
And will history come back to bite us on the bottom ? E-mail us at
mehstg@blueyonder.co.uk to
let us know your views.
|
22.04.2008
THE
KING OF HARTS
Can you name all the
black players who have captained English clubs to silverware?
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
No ? I’ll give you a club, there are
three of them.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
The men in question I was seeking, were
Sol Campbell, Patrick Vieira and Ledley King.
That’s it, which is incredible when you
consider there have been black players in the top flight and lining
up for England since the 1970s, but perhaps not so when you realise
that there are only a handful of black men ever to manage an English
Football League club, of which Ince at MK Dons is the only one that
springs instantly to mind.
Of course, two of those black captains
lifted trophies at Tottenham, although Vieira is the only one of the
trio to lift two different trophies. And if Campbell captains
Portsmouth and wins the FA Cup this season, then he will be the
first black captain to lift two different trophies with two
different clubs.
I don’t want to dwell any further on any
achievement Campbell makes in the game, because the man deserves
absolutely none of them, and I’ll leave aside Vieira because he
played for the enemy, but notwithstanding, there is no question
Ledley King joined in February a very elite band of men in the
English game.
It takes desire, commitment, mental
strength and self belief to reach the position that Ledley has done,
and his position as captain at the club perhaps reveals more about
the man than his on pitch persona seems to suggest. The very fact
that Rio Ferdinand is the first black player to captain England,
in 2008, tells you just what beliefs and views he could have had
to overcome to first become a professional player, and then captain
of one of the biggest clubs in England. Naturally, this all makes
Ledley King a role model for black youngsters, showing they can
achieve success if they want to.
Even so, from the interviews I have seen
of King, he seems a very shy young man, and one who certainly
doesn’t revel in the limelight and almost circus-like attention
which seems to follow in the Premier League’s wake, and he probably
would feel his rise through the ranks first to the first team, then
becoming captain before finally winning the League Cup this season,
was part of his job, in the same way you or I would accept a
promotion offered by our respective company’s.
Aside from being a black role model,
let’s consider Ledley King the player, and the role he has played at
Tottenham Hotspur since he made his first team debut. King became a
professional in 1998, making his debut away to Liverpool in 1999.
By 2000, he was playing in midfield, and starting to make a name for
himself in that role, even scoring the fastest ever Premier League
goal away to Bradford in that year.
He was integral in Tottenham’s FA Cup
run in 2001, when the club were beset by injuries, and the following
season, when that other black cup-winning captain for Tottenham left
to join the enemy, he emerged from his shadow to make his name as
the top defender at the club. And who amongst us doesn’t remember
the pictures of a youthful Ledley King sitting on the Cardiff turf
after Tottenham had lost the 2002 League Cup final to Blackburn?
However, that pain was cushion somewhat
for Ledley by his first cap for England. Despite his obvious
talent, King has won just eighteen caps for England, which is even
more outrageous when you consider that Phil Neville has over fifty
(in fact, if Neville has that many, where are my England caps?).
In the following campaign, he suffered a
hip injury which put him out for a long period of the season, a
campaign in which Tottenham struggled towards the end and shipped a
large number of goals. In 2003, Hoddle was sacked, and King was
moved back into midfield by Pleat, who wished to offer his defence
more cover. The move seemed to have some impact, and the team were
able to consolidate their Premier League status.
However, once more King showed signs of
the form which had already interested a number of Premiership clubs,
and Eriksson showed no hesitation in bringing the player into his
Euro 2004 squad. If there were any doubters to his ability, they
would have been blown aside after his performance against France in
the opening group match, in which he totally marked Thierry Henry,
then the best player in the Premier League, and one of the top
players in the world, out of the game.
Compare that to Terry’s shaky
performance in the same game next to him, and it is hard to
understand the criminal decision which meant the Chelsea man kept
his spot at the expense of King.
Back at Spurs, and following Euro 2004,
Ledley King finally was given a defensive partner able to bring him
on to the sustained level which all Spurs fans were now hoping for.
Naybet joined, and by Christmas King was producing the sustained
performance’s his potential had always hinted at. In January of
that season, after Redknapp left for Southampton, he was appointed
Club Captain by new manager Martin Jol.
In his first full season as captain, and
King almost led Tottenham to the promised land of the Champions
League, as the club eventually finished fifth. After being fourth
for so long, it was hard for all of us to accept the manner in which
Arsenal usurped us, yet looking back perhaps it is unsurprising as
King injured himself at Everton, with a handful of games to go.
That injury more or less blighted his
entire campaign the following season, as he played less than half
the games, and the defence acted like a colander. This season, as
we know, has been the same, with King not featuring until Boxing
Day.
More than simply his longevity at the
club, it is his talent which makes King such a great player. What
stands out so much is his pace, yet he is such a great reader of the
game, strong tackler and solid in the air. These days, defenders
are more than simply players who are employed to hack the ball away
from their goal, and lunge fearlessly into challenges designed to
take the man and the ball.
Defence in the modern game requires a
great deal of patience, and a sizeable degree of subtly. With most
challenges that would have been deemed acceptable in twenty years
ago receiving a caution these days, a defender’s prime asset is not
tackling, but the ability to read the ball, make good judgements and
position himself well to intercept passes. Of course, tackling
hasn’t left the game wholly, yet the is no question it is slowly
being driven out.
King has these assets in abundance. If
you want to see his pace, go to You Tube and look for his last ditch
challenge on Robben last season, when he outpaced one of the fastest
players in the world or his tackle on Huckerby in Norwich’s last
trip to White Hart Lane. You only have to watch the League Cup
final from this season to see all the other aspects of his game, and
suddenly his value to club becomes obvious.
So imagine my surprise when I hear Ramos
say last week he is considering taking the captaincy from him, and
even letting Ledley King go if he can't manage to play every week.
To my mind, Ledley King is the club. One of the few players in
recent seasons to actually emerge from the Tottenham youth setup and
establish himself at the club, he is one of us, immersed in
Tottenham heritage. The only man even close, in Tottenhamness, is
Robbie Keane.
The media, and I’m sure plenty of fans,
will consider the Berbatov saga the more interesting of the summer
in terms of our club, yet it isn’t the case at all. Berbatov is a
frighteningly good talent, and I speak as a man who has watched him
play live what must be close to fifty times, yet he came to England
with an agenda; raise his profile, get into a team capable of
winning trophies and playing Champions League football. And let’s
face facts, we aren’t likely to be in the top four next season
either, because with the number of players Ramos probably isn’t
happy with, I expect a hefty amount of the squad to be changed in
the summer, and teams take time to take shape, so we might as well
get more money for Berbatov this summer, and spend it on his
replacement and bringing in some substance to the midfield.
Besides which, when King has been out of
the side, Tottenham laboured to fifth last season and have struggled
for consistency this campaign. Before Berbatov, Tottenham were
ninety minutes away from the Champions League. So to my mind,
losing King is a bigger story, because he is Tottenham. And if he
is thrust out of the club this summer, I for one would be
distraught.
Do you agree with Richard about Ledders ?
Will it change the feel of the club if he does leave ? E-mail us at
mehstg@blueyonder.co.uk to
let us know your views.
|
|
Richard,
Great
article, and it would be a shame to see King stripped of the captaincy,
or even worse leave. One comment though - didn't Paul Ince captain
England ?
Cheers, and
keep up the good work !
Mart |
|
Hi Richard,
You are, from my rather
jaded opinion, spot-on my friend and I'm glad I am not the only Yiddo
thinking it. Having drunkenly ranted about this for weeks, I'll spare
you the details, but like Mabbutt before him - balls to his race, Gary
was definitely Ledders' natural predecessor - I would rather have Ledley
in the squad playing seven solid games in a season if that be the
worse-cased scenario than to ship him out.
Berbatov, I suspect like,
but having been through this before, if he wants to go, get on with it.
We lost Carrick in similar circumstances and why the legacy of that move
debatedly had led us to our current predicament - success and failure in
an uncharitable pattern - Tottenham as ever carry on regardless.
While seeing Berba smile
after winning the Carling Cup will stay in my mind as a moment akin to
potentially seeing that of a new born child entering into the world, I
don't feel I can claim him as a player like Ginola or Gazza as something
that is Tottenham through and through.
So we know Keano and Woody
will be there, and let's pray Ledley will join as well - there is always
next season as they say, and while the inner anguish will no doubt be as
high as ever, I can't wait.
Come on you Spurs.
Neil Merrett |
07.04.2008
THE
STATE OF PLAY
Are Tottenham the highest maintenance
side in the world? Is there any other side who could capitulate
quite so remarkably to Newcastle, ten days after such a stirring
comeback against Chelsea? Add to that that Tottenham tend to labour
to breakdown a lot of sides (and if you watch them as often as I
have, you will realise how frustratingly true that is, despite all
the goals we have scored) and look about as easy to score against
Derby County.
Ramos hit the nail on the head last week
when he commented that the team seem to perform well against the top
sides, but struggle against the lesser sides. Welcome to Tottenham,
Juande, we’ve been doing that more or less every season since the
1960s.
Yet at least Ramos wants to change the
culture of the club, turning it into a consistent side. To do that,
however, he will need to change the ethos at Spurs from top to
bottom. Not giving you manager the support or freedom to operate in
the transfer market as he wishes instantly spring to mind, but it is
deeper than that. How many youth players break into the first
team? O’Hara and King are the only two, and that is a poor return,
especially when you consider just how many youth players break into
the Manchester United first team. And what about the freedom of
information surrounding the club? How often are we aware of
Tottenham’s transfer targets and departing players when the windows
rear their ugly heads? What about the fact that everyone in the
stadium knew Martin Jol was about to be/had been/ in the process of
being sacked during the Getafe match? Professional, well run,
businesses should be able to ensure their employees don’t go
blabbing.
That said, in Ramos we have someone who
has already changed the whole face of his previous clubs, bringing
unparalleled sustained success to most of his former teams. Twice
promoted from Spain’s second tier, his serious success has been well
documented, coming at Sevilla, where he won two UEFA Cups and a
Spanish Cup. When you consider the fact that the two Seville based
clubs, Sevilla and Betis, are akin to Newcastle and Sunderland, in
that they have huge fanbases yet never seem to win anything, (it is
not even uncommon to see them in the second flight, just as
Newcastle were in the 1980s and Sunderland very recently) you can
see exactly why he was praised so highly in Spain.
That therefore makes the Tottenham job
the biggest of his career to date, and not only must he step up to
the challenge, but he must also adapt to the Premier League in the
process. Let us not forget that before Jol, Tottenham hadn’t
finished in the top six for fifteen years, and after two successive
fifth placed finishes the board decided to eject him. So if Ramos
thinks the Carling Cup win might have given him some breathing
space, he has another thing coming.
Standards are high at Tottenham, and
rightly so. If people ask me what I think Tottenham should be
aiming for over the next few seasons, I will say that next year I
would be happy to have our fifth place back again, and a proper tilt
at all the cups, but from that point onwards I want a Champions
League place. Some might call that arrogant, that Spurs have no
place up there because they have never featured in the competition
before, and only once played in the European Cup, but there was a
time when Liverpool hadn’t either, and besides, ambition means you
set yourself challenging targets, doesn’t it ?
I think the club, in general, shares
that ambition. We supposedly have a better training ground than
Real Madrid’s, we are a rich, and financially well run club
(probably the best thing ENIC does is the books), we are well
supported and are looking to build a new ground, or improve White
Hart Lane, we seem to have an improving scouting network and academy
system. Naturally, there is still potential for growth, yet it is
moving in the right direction. That said, the area where Tottenham
have fallen down so dramatically this season, is on the pitch,
specifically the current first team.
You could ask any man propping up any
bar stall in any pub in the country at the start of this season, and
they would have highlighted our defence as the key area that needed
improving. Who did we get? Darren Bent, a player who seems light
years away from the type of forward we need anyway, let alone a
defender. Yes, we bought Bale and Kaboul, yet they didn’t have the
experience required to break the top four, and youthful potential
can only take you so far.
When the board took on Jol, the club’s
policy was firmly based around buying in the brightest youngsters
they could, and form a side that had the potential to one day
challenge the established teams. If was refreshing, it was
innovative, and it almost worked. But this type of policy requires
patience, and when the club came so close, as they did in 2005/06,
you can forgive a little bit if expectations are raised. That said,
there seemed a decisive policy shift around this point, as the board
decided the policy was not only a good one, but would deliver
success in a set timeframe. But when you want to achieve things,
you need the knowledge and craft to do so. I might be able to paint
a fence, but when you want to paint a bridge, you hire an
experienced contractor. You get someone in who knows how to do the
job, a professional. It’s the same with players. You can blood
youngster and sign players who are looking to make the step up all
you want, but if you want to achieve something you need to have a
core of players capable and experienced at playing at that
standard. Tottenham forgot that in the summer, and felt that their
policy of buying youthful, talented players would see them safely
into the top four.
Fast forward to January, and it clear
wasn’t just Jol who was bemoaning the summer signings, but his
successor. Add to this that Comolli’s job is on the line if Ramos
failed, and suddenly the this policy has been put on hold. Ramos’
decision to bring in four defenders in January was an obvious one.
Woodgate and Hutton certainly look the business and tick the boxes
that should have been ticked in the summer. If you add King to the
mix, and he stays fit for the thirty league games next season
(please God) then you have the basis for a decent defence. Bale is
hopefully the player Ramos will plump for at left back, because
Gilberto already does not look good enough to fill that slot, and is
not even able to displace the disinterested Chimbonda.
What is more key now is the question of
who will start the season between the sticks. I don’t know what
happened to Robinson at the World Cup in 2006, but the decent keeper
we sent off to Germany came back a shadow, and he has only
diminished subsequently. There are plenty of rumours circulating at
the moment which suggest he was offered for sale in January, but
there weren’t any takers.
I don’t believe that in the slightest.
He is still a decent keeper on his day, and an incredible shot
stopper. Plenty of times I have already accepted we have conceded
when he makes a point blank save to keep the scores level. The
problem is that two minutes later he stands behind his wall and
sticks his arm out as the ball flies into the empty, gaping half of
the goal when an opponent gets a free kick.
He isn’t what we need if we want to
break that top four. We need someone who is going to be comfortable
guarding his net for 85 minutes of a match, before springing into
action when seriously threatened. That what Cech does so well,
because when Chelsea are exposed he makes so few mistakes that it
becomes so hard to break them down.
I like the look of this Lopez guy, who
currently plays for Villarreal. He looks like he might be the above
kind of keeper, who can not only make a save when it counts, but
actually dominate his box in the way Robinson fails to. The problem
is his fee, which is £27 million. However, what a good keeper can
guarantee you is ten to fifteen extra points a season, over the
average ones. Confidence at the back radiates through the team, so
you could even say that it’s not even the points a keeper has
tangibly picked up from match winning saves, but the belief inspired
in his team-mates that one or two goals is enough to win that a good
keeper brings you.
I’ve spoken previously about the need to
beef up our midfield and get some proper, creative midfielders in
the side, especially wide men. Add to that the need to bring in a
forward capable of challenging Keane and Berbatov, yet happy to sit
behind them for long periods and offering something different. This
need might require two forwards, probably one youngster and an older
player. When you total that up, and our existing needs at the back,
you are looking for seven or eight players for the first team, with
the same number going out.
We have seen previously that a dramatic
intake of players disrupts the team, although this summer will be
the one that Ramos uses to lay down his foundations for building his
side, it is worrying nevertheless. Clearly, he doesn’t favour the
same types of players as Jol, favouring an aggressive, fit,
possession based attacking side over a ball playing, technical,
possession based attacking side that the Dutchman preferred.
I am concerned that the one area in
which Jol was vastly superior over Ramos, that being team building
and spirit, is being eroded by events behind the scenes at White
Hart Lane. Berbatov seems as moody as ever, Chimbonda clearly
doesn’t want to be there, half a dozen players are frozen out, and
another few are treated badly despite their obvious commitment.
Hauling Keane off, for instance, match after match doesn’t do his
confidence any good, and his goals have dried up as a result. I can
appreciate that Ramos wants to be certain about every player at his
disposal, and therefore needs to give others game time, in
particular Bent, but spirit is a key element to success.
Chelsea were most effective under
Mourinho when they worked as unit, when they seemed machine-like in
their actions. Manchester United have always had that togetherness,
generated by Ferguson’s ability to create a siege mentality around
his team. When you consider too, that Arsenal’s season has
unravelled since Bendtner and Adebayor decided to have a fight in
our penalty box in January, and Gallas’ reaction to the draw at
Birmingham, you can see just how important it is.
It is the thing, arguably the only
thing, which Keegan does best, and the reason why his Newcastle side
were so high in the table in the past. He doesn’t worry about
tactics, he just sends his players out to play. It shouldn’t work
in the modern Premiership, but in the nineties it saw his team soar
to the upper echelons on the table.
I am, of course, looking at the
foundations and worrying about future cracks. I don’t know if Ramos
will worry about this aspect of the team until the summer, when he
has assembled the core of his squad. I hope that is the case,
because we have been through the poor man management of Graham with
Ginola and Hoddle with Freund to know that in these days of player
power, you have to treat them with some degree of kid gloves, even
if their petulance doesn’t deserve it
This summer, therefore, is as important
for Tottenham as it is for Ramos. It is the biggest club he has
managed, and one capable, on paper at least, of establishing
themselves at the top of the world game. Don’t believe me? Well
consider that we are the fourth best supported team in the country,
eleventh richest in the world, and could have a genuinely world
class training ground. And that’s without playing a minute of
Champions League football and after being crap for fifteen years.
We need him to get this right, because
at the moment we are still a magnet for some of the best players in
the world, and we need this current league campaign to be a blip
rather than a return to the status quo. In short, in six weeks
time, Ramos’ work at Tottenham really begins, and the man cannot be
judged as a success or failure until that time.
Has Richard identified the right areas to
improve ? E-mail us at
mehstg@blueyonder.co.uk to
let us know your views. |
24.03.2008
ENIGMA
‘A riddle wrapped in a mystery
inside an enigma.’
Churchill may have said those
words about Russia in 1941, yet they could so easily be applied to
Jermaine Jenas. The stand out player in both semi final legs
against Arsenal, in which he scored in both games, and one of the
best players on the pitch in the Carling Cup Final this year, it is
quite clear that Jenas has it within himself to become one of the
star players in the Premier League. But then compare those
performances to the one against Chelsea, last week, or in the first
leg against PSV. Okay, so in the latter none of our players exactly
performed to their highest ability, but in these types of game the
area of the pitch most key to victory is the midfield; control that,
and you win the game.
I’m of the opinion that Ramos
will hold on to Jenas next season, and will look for someone
physical to line up next to him. If that is the case, then we need
Jenas to not only find consistency, but perform to the same standard
as Gerrard, Lampard, Fabregas and Ronaldo. That is the standard we
will need from him if we are to break into the top four, as that
position is key to sustained success.
But, before we go any further,
let consider Jenas’ background, because that is key to understanding
exactly the type of player we have on our books. Jenas is
twenty-five years old, and has played in the Premier League since
2006. Tottenham are his third club, having played previously for
Nottingham Forest in what is now the Championship (what used to be
the First Division and what should be the Second Division), before
moving to Newcastle for five million.
Jenas only played one full
season for Forest, in which they lined up with a number of
youngsters. The following season, they reached the play-offs, proof
that the team from which Jenas graduated was a good one, although
still learning their trade in the season he played for them.
In his first season at
Newcastle, he won the PFA Young Player of the Year Award, scoring
six goals in the league. Yet he couldn’t build on his impressive
debut season, and his next two campaigns were disappointing. After
three full seasons at Newcastle, he arrived at Tottenham for seven
million.
When he arrived at Spurs, he
was clearly a player low on confidence and Jol did a very good job
in rebuilding the player’s morale and self belief over the season.
The result was a vintage season for Jenas, as he hit six goals in
thirty league games for the club, as they went to the cusp of
Champions League qualification.
The following season he hit
the same number of goals, although only in twenty-five matches, and
for the first time you could see the important role he played for
the side. In the previous campaign to the last, his good season had
been overshadowed by Carrick’s awesome displays, Lennon’s emergence
and Davids’ battling. But last season, with Carrick gone and Davids
in the background, Jenas’ energy became all the more key. That was
underlined to me in the second leg of the Arsenal cup matches, where
he was absent and the FA Cup match against Southend, which he
dominated.
Most of the media seem agreed
that Jenas is the most improved player since Ramos’ arrival at the
club, doubtless due to the fact that Jenas has a reputation as an
energetic, box to box midfielder. The Spaniards much publicised and
lauded fitness regime undoubtedly served to improve Jenas, who
looked the fittest player in the Jol era as it was.
These days, he does seem to
impose himself for longer on matches, especially against the lesser
sides at home, but he still needs to dominate games against the top
sides, and away from home there are plenty of Tottenham players who
seem to play within themselves. Nonetheless, Jenas is key to
Tottenham hopes.
About a yet ago, I wrote that
Jenas’ return to the side had coincided with a resurgence within
Tottenham, and a run of five matches. I also wrote that to break
the top four, you need a goalscoring midfielder. That hasn’t
changed, in fact, Ronaldo has underlined the need all too readily
this campaign, but I will add also that whoever plays in the centre
needs to impose themselves on matches, and control the games.
The question begs itself,
therefore, considering the length of time Jenas has played in the
top flight, and the frequency with which he is called into the
England squad, why Jenas isn’t more focal in more matches. He is a
player who gets into goalscoring positions on a surprisingly regular
basis; he sets up goals, he can tackle, dribble, beat a man, pass,
run, cover, out muscle, and score, but what is most frustrating is
his failure to maintain that, and link it all together.
In his first season at
Tottenham, on his return to Newcastle, Jenas had the ball in the box
and, faced with an open goal after beating a couple of defenders and
with Given nowhere in sight, he blasted the ball into the crowd.
Was that a sign of a lack of composure, or something deeper? A
season later, who can forget the open goal he faced at Anfield when
the score was 0-0 and all he had to do was slide the ball into the
net, and he touched it wide? What about this season in Eindhoven,
where he was brilliant for 120 minutes, and stepping up for the
final spot kick, produced a terrible penalty, without any disguise
on the direction, and at a saveable height ?
You could claim that these
events speak of bad luck, you could claim they show a lack of
composure, but I think it is something deeper than that. He doesn’t
seem like he has faced any real setbacks in his life to date, and
consequently has never had to prove himself in anything. As a
youngster you could imagine that he was head and shoulders better
than anyone else at the game, because he is so full of running and
so talented with the ball. That creates complacency, because he has
never had to prove his talent.
At Forest, he made his debut
at eighteen, and a year later was at Newcastle, who at the time were
one of the clubs vying for a Champions League spot. Doesn’t seem
like he exactly had to fight for his place there either, does it?
When it all comes so easily too you throughout your life, you don’t
learn how to fight to get what you want, or overcome a setback. I’m
of the belief that this element of his temperament is what is
chiefly responsible for his inability to impose himself on matches.
And this is where Ramos’ role
comes into it, to my mind. The Spaniard has a reputation for
getting players and teams to believe in themselves and not on match
the top sides on a match to match basis, but across the whole
season. He had already shown that this season with Tottenham,
beating Arsenal and Chelsea and drawing with Manchester United and
Chelsea in the league at White Hart Lane. In Spain, he won two UEFA
Cups and the Spanish Cup in two years with Seville, a club similar
to Newcastle or Sunderland in England.
So he has a track record in
getting the best out of players, and a reputation for winning
trophies. That is good news for us, because if he can get Jenas
firing and performing at the level he has shown in brief flashes,
then we might well be able to match the big four over the course of
a league season for the first time in three seasons.
To my mind, there is still one
piece of the puzzle missing. Not only must Ramos train the right
mentality and temperament into Jenas, he must also find someone to
play alongside him who can compliment him. Jenas is a slight
player, and sometimes it seems as though he has been bullied out of
games, and fades in the fiercest arenas. Having a Dave Mackay style
battler next to him will free him up to play his game, and perhaps
give him the confidence to produce consistent high level
performances. And if Ramos and Tottenham are serious about reaching
the highest level, then they must crack the code of the enigma that
is Jermaine Jenas.
Do you think Richard is
right ? E-mail us at
mehstg@blueyonder.co.uk to
let us know your views.
|
10.03.2008
BRAVE NEW WORLD
The 1932 novel by
Aldous Huxley of the above name concerns itself with John, a savage
from Malpais, a land which was outside of the ‘civilised’ world of
the future. In the book, John was the son of a woman from the world
outside the compound, who had been abandoned there. John was an
outcast from the tribe which his mother attached herself too, as he
was deemed not one of them and denied the chance to participate in
the various rite of passage which all the young boys of the tribe
were put through.
Only when Bernard, a psychologist, goes to the
reservation and discovers John, does he bring him and his mother
back to the civilised world. John had dreamed of such a place since
his childhood, taught him stories of the world she had come from and
given him a glorious ideal of the world outside the reservation to
which he had been born.
Yet John, on entering this new world, discovers
he hates it, and finds their values and beliefs totally alien to his
own. John was rejected by the society to which he was born, and
unable to fathom the one which he had joined. And there are times,
when considering modern day European football, that I sometimes feel
like John the savage; because the label on the can I opened does not
tell the whole truth.
I’ll leave aside the two things I despise most
about the current incarnation of the UEFA Cup, those being the
ludicrously unfair group stage, where you play two teams at home and
two away, and the fact that the Champions League losers get to drop
into the competition, a fact which thoroughly devalues it, because
the thing most evident to me on Thursday was that PSV arrived to
nullify us and win, the way you would approach an away match in the
league.
In the 1950s and 60s, when European football was
a new and all European campaigns were adventures into the unknown,
excitement in these games was expected. The game in those days was
vastly different from today anyway; all teams felt it was their
responsibility to entertain, and every team went out to win every
match they played.
I am far too young to have been present in those
early European adventures for Tottenham, yet I’m told of memorable
matches against Dukla Prague and Benfica in our solitary European
Cup season, and of the wondrous manner in which we played in the
following season’s Cup Winner’s Cup, culminating with the 5-1
demolition of Atletico Madrid in the final. Tottenham became the
first British Club to win a European trophy in that season, and ever
since they have been synonymous with European football.
A few more European campaigns followed in the
60s, yet it wasn’t until 1971 that Tottenham first played in the
UEFA Cup, the inaugural season of that competition, and won the
competition. The following season, they lost to Liverpool in the
semi finals, and in 1973/74, they lost to Feyenoord in the final.
Between 1981 and 1985, Tottenham also qualified for European
competition. In 1981/82, and 1982/83 they were in the Cup Winner’s
Cup, in 1983/84 and 1984/85 they were in the UEFA Cup, winning the
competition in the first of those seasons.
But following that, there was the Heysel tragedy,
and English clubs were banned from European competition for five
seasons. When the ban was lifted, Tottenham appeared in the Cup
Winner’s Cup in 1991/92, but they were a shadow of what they once
had been. Financial difficulties meant the club had sold off their
top players, and had begun to slip into mid-table, where we were
destined to languish for the next twelve years. Despite that, two
brief European campaigns were still embarked upon; the Intertoto cup
in 1995/96, and the UEFA Cup in 1999/2000.
And that was about it. And while we Tottenham
fans sat outside of European competition for such a long period of
time, effectively since 1985 because the three campaigns in the
interim were so brief, the game in Europe change absolutely. In the
old days, Europe was a reward for a successful domestic campaign.
It wasn’t guaranteed or expected, it was special. Straight forward,
two-legged, knockout matches went from start to finish, and fans
would flock to the games to see if their side, made up almost
exclusively of British players, would line up against foreign
players and teams that had never been heard of. In some cases,
players such as Johan Cruyff and Beckenbauer would arrive at British
grounds, players who would have only been seen on television sets in
the World Cup, and never in the flesh.
Yet familiarity breeds contempt, and European
football is a world away from those days now. Manchester United
have enjoyed consecutive Champion’s League seasons since 1996, and
Arsenal since 1999. Clubs now are guaranteed a number of money
spinning fixtures in a group stage before the competition enters its
serious phase post Christmas, and all matches are on television.
PSV are one such club who are typical of this new
type of European club. They seem to appear in the Champions League
every season, and in more recent campaigns have reached the quarter
and semi finals of that competition. No longer holding its
special-ness for PSV, and with the easy access to football from
across the world and the very nature of football, which sees the top
players invariably end up with the bigger clubs in the biggest
leagues, PSV would have found no surprises when they faced
Tottenham, and we would have had little when they lined up against
us.
They came with a game plan, to nullify our
attacks, pack the midfield and deny us space and time to threaten.
They set themselves up to be cagey, to hit us on the break and suck
us in deep, to deny us the ball for long periods, and chase the
game, and to pounce on mistakes. That’s exactly how they play when
they go to the Ajax ArenA or De Kuip. And, as lacklustre as I think
we were, I’m not going to take away anything from their performance.
But, as someone pointed out to me in the week
before the game, in the modern European game, its not about what you
do at home, but what you do away that counts. Arsenal avoided
conceding at home against AC Milan, and once they nullified the
Italians and Fabregas’ speculative long shot went in, they were
through. Likewise, last season AC drew 2-2 with Bayern Munich in
the San Siro and won in Germany by two goals in the return.
Liverpool beat Barcelona in the last sixteen in
the Nou Camp and PSV in the Phillips Stadium, yet they lost to the
Spaniards at Anfield and only beat a well beaten PSV 1-0 in the
second leg. So too, did Chelsea knockout Valencia in Spain last
season.
And this is not a recent development either, only
impacting Europe in the last two seasons, because Bayer Leverkusen
were ruthlessly attacking the first leg of their Champions League
semi final in 2002 against Manchester United, ensuring they left the
north-west with a 2-2 draw. In the home match, they were cagey and
tight, and did enough to progress.
Away
goals are what counts nowadays, and with that in mind we should be
pleased that PSV were only able to pick up one. They don’t get any
further chance to get an away goal in the tie, whereas we do.
Equally, the tie is not dead, and the Dutch team will know that. As
Gilberto so dreadfully showed on Thursday, it only takes one mistake
to change the face of a game, and in Holland it that chance falls to
us first and is taken, it will wholly change the face of the tie.
The Dutch fans would urge their team on, as the
home side, they would attack, leaving space to exploit at the back,
and if Berbatov, Keane, Lennon and Malbranque are playing as we all
know they can, it could provide a second. And then PSV need two,
and in Europe, that’s a mountain to collectively overcome. We have
nothing to lose in this tie, whereas PSV might be tempted to hold
onto what they have. And, as with everything, to the brave go the
spoils. Its time for Tottenham to stand up, and yet again, be
counted.
|
Back
to homepage |